Why should anyone in Texas Family Court settle for an unqualified, shill associate or Title IV-D judge? #
You don’t have to! You can simply use the statutes of the State of Texas to remove that moron associate judge (looking at you Krazy Kate). In any hypothetical case, Baba-Yaga would never settle for the bottom of the bottom of the barrel. Make those clowns stay in the building and work.
Also, about 90% of the corruption and damage is done by the garbage associate judges. Let us look at a real world example, the idiot DEI hire Kenny “I’m a Christian” Newell and his law school girlfriend Krazy Kate Stone from the Tarrant County 233rd. Kate is alledged (we won’t name our sources, but they would know) to be the long standing fantasy mistress of one Kenny Newell, the District Judge of the 233rd. Kenny, a black, incompetent, fake-Christian, DEI hire who traffics children for money, wants to ‘become one’ with Kate, but Kenny is married… I digress.
So, with such a effed-up dynamic, does anyone think that Kenny would ever correct the idiocy of Krazy Kate? Nope. Add to that obvious issue of bias, the fact that Kate is known as Krazy Kate from the day she took the associate bench, and the ENTIRE COURTHOUSE calls her that. Hell, they are the one’s that informed Baba-Yaga of the love nest in the 233wrd and her utter incompetence, way back before Baba-Yaga was born from the 233rd.
So, yes! Recuse the lower pedos, and make the elected pedo responsible for everything that happens in your case. The lesser pedo is not elected and you have less remedy when they commit their crimes. Always go for the throat.
The BELOW is an example of what Baba-Yaga would file in his hypothetical case with a moron like Kate Stone.
STANDING RECUSAL/DISQUALIFICATION
Associate Judges and Judges for Title IV-D cases are appointed and serve according to Chapter 201 of the Texas Family Code. In all situations where a case has been referred to an associate judge, a party may submit a written objection to the appointed associate judge hearing a trial on the merits.
Therefore, this Motion serves as a Standing Objection of any and all Associate and/or non-Elected and/or unelectable judges, in perpetuity. Respondent will not accept any judge who is not elected and electable (See TFC Section 20l.005 (b) & (c)).
Respondent shall Recuse/Disqualify any attempt to assign any judge who lacks accountability to the voters, as is Respondent’s right.
Ebulliently submitted,
